Skip to content
Talk About: Law and Religion

Talk About: Law and Religion

Working to secure the blessings of freedom or religion or belief for all people

  • Home
    • About the Blog
  • Posts
    • Stateless and Hyperlegalized: The Indian state weaponizes paperwork
    • Ukrainian Autocephaly, One Year On
    • (Anti)Religious Speech and State Security Measures
    • Religious Freedom and Security as Mutually Reinforcing Objectives: Reflections on the New OSCE/ODIHR Policy Guidance
    • Human Dignity: Building Understanding
    • Juan Martin Vives (1980-2019)
    • Beyond equality: How should we aid survivors of genocide?
    • International Day Commemorating the Victims of Acts of Violence Based on Religion or Belief
    • Interfaith dialogue can combat extremism
    • Challenges to Religious Liberty Today
    • “Religion is a weapon and a victim of the conflict in Ukraine”
    • Bangladesh: Do We Need a Ministry for Religious Minorities?
    • Masterpiece Cakeshop: And the winner is … pluralism?
  • Conversations
    • Ukrainian Autocephaly, One Year On
      • Religious Policies under President Zelensky
      • A Year after the Tomos: The Moscow Patriarchate’s Narratives About the New Church and Itself
      • From Chaplains of Maidan to Military Chaplains: One Year after the Tomos
      • The Orthodox Church of Ukraine: Can Relations with the Russian Orthodox Church Be Normalized?
      • U.S. Interference in Ukraine’s Autocephaly: An Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Unlikely Affair
      • A Language of “Sects” in Russian Reflections of Ukrainian Autocephaly
    • (Anti)Religious Speech and State Security Measures
      • Symbols, Speech, and Security
      • Modern Book-Burning: Protected Speech?
      • More Than a Feeling
      • Disproportionality of Anti-Extremist Measures: The Case of Faizrakhamanists in Russia
    • Religious Freedom and Security as Mutually Reinforcing Objectives: Reflections on the New OSCE/ODIHR Policy Guidance
      • Freedom of Religion or Belief and Security – Some Reflections
      • Security Measures and the Gender Dimension of Freedom of Religion or Belief
      • More Security Does Not Require Less Freedom: The Case of the NYPD Surveillance Program
      • The Names of Religious Groups and Security-Related Concerns
      • Let Freedom of Religion or Belief Pave the Way to Peaceful and Inclusive Societies
  • Human Dignity Initiative
    • Human Dignity: Building Understanding
  • Authors
    • Mohsin Alam Bhat
    • Robert Blitt
    • Elizabeth Clark
    • Cole Durham
    • Andriy Fert
    • Elizaveta Gaufman
    • Tetiana Kalynychenko
    • Maria Kravchenko
    • Andrii Krawchuk
    • Farzana Mahmood
    • Ewelina Ochab
    • Stanislav Panin
    • Brett Scharffs
    • Jeroen Temperman
    • Donlu Thayer
    • Asma Uddin
    • Dmytro Vovk
    • Catherine Wanner
    • Peter Weiderud
    • Jane Wise
    • Mine Yıldırım
Posted on October 11, 2019December 11, 2019

Symposium 2019 Videos:
Opening Session
and Scharffs, Durham, Clark Concluding Remarks

  • Opening Sesson (entire)
  • Concluding remarks by Center Director Brett Scharffs
  • Concluding remarks by Founding Director Cole Durham
  • Concluding remarks by Associate Director and Symposium Chair Elizabeth Clark
CategoriesCenter Posts

Post navigation

Previous PostPrevious Symposium 2019: Session Recordings
Next PostNext Symposium 2019: Recordings of all Keynote Speeches and Plenary Sessions

Recent Posts

  • Stateless and Hyperlegalized: The Indian state weaponizes paperwork January 15, 2020
  • Ukrainian Autocephaly, One Year On January 9, 2020
  • Religious Policies under President Zelensky January 9, 2020
  • A Year after the Tomos: The Moscow Patriarchate’s Narratives About the New Church and Itself January 9, 2020
  • From Chaplains of Maidan to Military Chaplains: One Year after the Tomos January 9, 2020
  • The Orthodox Church of Ukraine: Can Relations with the Russian Orthodox Church Be Normalized? January 9, 2020
  • U.S. Interference in Ukraine’s Autocephaly: An Ineffective, Unnecessary, and Unlikely Affair January 9, 2020
  • A Language of “Sects” in Russian Reflections of Ukrainian Autocephaly January 9, 2020
  • (Anti)Religious Speech and State Security Measures December 10, 2019
  • Symbols, Speech, and Security December 10, 2019
  • Modern Book-Burning: Protected Speech? December 10, 2019
  • More Than a Feeling December 10, 2019

Contact Us

452 J. Reuben Clark Building
Brigham Young University
Provo, UT 84602
USA
801.422.6842
talkabout@iclrs.org

Please Note

The opinions expressed in the posts on this website do not necessarily represent the opinions of the faculty or staff of the International Center for Law and Religion Studies or the J. Reuben Clark Law School, or of Brigham Young University or its sponsoring church.

The International Center for Law and Religion Studies

A part of the J. Reuben Clark Law School at Brigham Young University, our mission is to help secure the blessings of freedom of religion and belief for all people by
- expanding, deepening, and disseminating knowledge and expertise regarding the interrelationship of law and religion,
- facilitating the growth of networks of scholars, experts, and policy makers involved in the field of religion and law, and
- contributing to law reform processes and broader implementation of principles of religious freedom worldwide.

Search

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • YouTube
  • Email
Proudly powered by WordPress