Pope Francis’s Humanitarian Diplomacy for Ukraine: Between Peacemaking and Geopolitics

Pavlo Smytsnyuk is a Mary Seeger O’Boyle Associate Research Scholar at Princeton University.

Cardinal Zuppi’s Mission

On 18 July 2023, U.S. President Joseph R. Biden met with the Pope’s special envoy, Cardinal Matteo Maria Zuppi, once again shining a spotlight on the Holy See’s peace efforts in the war in Ukraine. The meeting follows Zuppi’s encounters with President Volodymyr Zelensky in Kyiv and with two senior officials in Moscow earlier this summer. Commentators now predict that Zuppi will make a similar voyage to Beijing.

(more…)

Continue Reading Pope Francis’s Humanitarian Diplomacy for Ukraine: Between Peacemaking and Geopolitics

Interview: Ori Aronson on Religion and the Constitutional Crisis in Israel

Ori Aronson is an associate professor of law at the Bar-Ilan University Faculty of Law, where he also serves as the deputy director of the Menomadin Center for Jewish and Democratic Law. He is a scholar of constitutional law and theory, courts and judicial decisionmaking. Much of his research concerns the institutional conditions of adjudication and the organization of legal power more broadly, with a focus on the ways legal systems accommodate, reflect, and challenge cultural and ideological difference. During the 2023–24 academic year Ori is a visiting scholar with the Harvard Center for Jewish Studies. Ori Aronson was interviewed by Dmytro Vovk.

This interview was recorded before the first law to limit the Israeli Supreme Court was adopted by the Knesset on 24 July 2023. The text has been lightly edited.

(more…)

Continue Reading Interview: Ori Aronson on Religion and the Constitutional Crisis in Israel

Another Case of Déjà Vu: The Sacrifice of Conscience to Monsters

Dr. Neville Rochow KC is an Australian barrister, associate professor (adjunct) at the University of Adelaide Law School, and a member of Elliot Johnston Chambers in Adelaide. The post is a part the Sacralization of AI series.

Introduction

The possession of a conscience is a fulcrum of the human rights project. The defining characteristic of humankind is the possession of conscience. Variously described, and difficult to define [1], conscience is essential to our capacity to make moral judgments. As Douglas Langston described “conscience,” it is “as a judging and punishing faculty” or an “internal judge” [2]. Summarizing the thought of Immanuel Kant and Sigmund Freud on the subject, conscience can be regarded as “moral reasoning, a personal monitor, emotive reasoning” [3]. Morality is not and cannot be mechanical [4]. Despite this, we seem willing to submit to totalitarian regimes that do not rule according to conscience and that profess no moral values: the corporation, and the algorithm.

(more…)

Continue Reading Another Case of Déjà Vu: The Sacrifice of Conscience to Monsters