The Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine: Implications for the Prosecution of Religious Leaders

Michelle Coleman is a senior lecturer in law at Swansea University.

There is no doubt that Russia’s invasion of Ukraine on 24 February 2022 was an act of aggression by the Russian State. In international law aggression is generally understood as when a country either starts a war against another country or engages in actions that drive another country to go to war. It is grounded in the idea that attacking another country goes against the peace and security and victim states’ own sovereignty and right to self-determination.

(more…)

Continue Reading The Special Tribunal for the Crime of Aggression against Ukraine: Implications for the Prosecution of Religious Leaders

Advocating for Religious Freedom—An Inextinguishable, God-Given Human Right

His Eminence Archbishop Anba Angaelos is the first Coptic Orthodox archbishop of London. The following post is based on his remarks during the panel “Religious Perspectives on Religious Freedom and Peace” at the ICLRS 31st Annual International Law and Religion Symposium, 8 October 2024.

In the book of Isaiah, the prophet declares, “The Spirit of the Lord is upon Me, Because the Lord has anointed Me to preach good tidings to the poor; He has sent Me to heal the brokenhearted, To proclaim liberty to the captives, And to open the prisons for those who are bound” (Isaiah 61:1). This is not just the role of religious leaders; this is the role of every person.

(more…)

Continue Reading Advocating for Religious Freedom—An Inextinguishable, God-Given Human Right

The Naming of Religious Groups: A Human Rights Analysis

A logo of the Mount Sinai Health System, an example of “denominational trademarks” / Shutterstock

In this series, contributors discuss the naming of religious entities as a religious freedom issue. Focusing on Australia, Bulgaria, Estonia, Poland, Romania, Spain, and Ukraine, they analyze regulations implemented or considered in these states to restrict the autonomy of religious groups in choosing a name. From the perspective of human rights law, this autonomy, as an aspect of freedom of religion or belief, is not absolute. States are allowed to proportionally interfere in the naming of religious organizations to balance religious autonomy against the rights of others or other legitimate values, such as protection of intellectual property.

(more…)

Continue Reading The Naming of Religious Groups: A Human Rights Analysis