Talk About: Law and Religion

Blog of
The International Center
for Law and Religion Studies

Featured Conversations

Recent Posts

In its landmark 1990 decision Employment Division v. Smith, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the First Amendment’s Free Exercise Clause does not require religious exemptions to neutral and generally applicable laws,even if those laws incidentally burden religious practice. Over the years, Smith has been criticized for its insensitivityand harm to religious needs and rights, particularly those of religious minorities. Frank S. Ravitch (Michigan State University College of Law) explains why he no longer supports the overturning of Smith.

Watch here

Pope Francis once described clericalism as “one of the greatest deformations” in the life of the Catholic Church. It is a strong diagnosis. What is striking, then, is how resistant that clericalism has proven to reform—even after Praedicate Evangelium, the most ambitious overhaul of the Roman Curia in decades.

That apostolic constitution, promulgated in March 2022 after nine years of preparation, contains a genuinely historic statement: for the first time in the history of the Catholic Church, any member of the faithful—including a laywoman—can in principle lead a dicastery of the Roman Curia. And Pope Francis did not merely open that door on paper. In January 2025, Sister Simona Brambilla became the first woman ever named prefect of a Vatican dicastery, and Sister Raffaella Petrini was appointed governor of Vatican City State. Under Pope Leo XIV, the momentum has continued: Sister Tiziana Merletti was named secretary of the same dicastery in May 2025, resulting in three of its top five positions held by women religious.

Continue reading

 

In Refah Partisi (the Welfare Party) and Others v. Turkey, the European Court of Human Rights sided with the Turkish Constitutional Court, which had ordered the dissolution of the party based on its being a threat to secular constitutional order. Brett G. Scharffs (International Center for Law and Religion Studies) explains why and how his and his students’ opinions about the Refah Partisi case have changed over the years and why he no longer considers the Court’s decision to be an overreaction.

Watch here

 

On 17 March 2026, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) issued a judgment regarding Catholic institutions in Germany and their employment relationships, in Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v. JB. The ruling established that a Catholic employer, in this case a pregnancy counseling office at Caritas, cannot terminate a contract of employment solely on the basis of the employee’s leaving the Catholic Church. The Court determined that such a dismissal constitutes unequal treatment, unless the employee’s church membership is a genuine, legitimate, and necessary requirement for the specific occupation. While acknowledging the right of churches to self-determination in employment matters, the CJEU determined the dismissal to be unlawful, as the employer did not generally require staff to be Catholic and had employed non-Catholics in similar roles.

Continue reading

 

Human Dignity Initiative

Celebrating the 70th anniversary of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights with an invitation to a global conversation about preserving and protecting human dignity for everyone everywhere.

Human-Dignity_Page_01-717x1024 (1)

Subscribe to our Monthly Newsletter

Fill out the form below to receive updates on topics in law and religion.