Talk About: Law and Religion
Blog of
The International Center
for Law and Religion Studies
Featured Conversations
Recent Posts
On 17 March 2026, the European Court of Justice (CJEU) issued a judgment regarding Catholic institutions in Germany and their employment relationships, in Katholische Schwangerschaftsberatung v. JB. The ruling established that a Catholic employer, in this case a pregnancy counseling office at Caritas, cannot terminate a contract of employment solely on the basis of the employee’s leaving the Catholic Church. The Court determined that such a dismissal constitutes unequal treatment, unless the employee’s church membership is a genuine, legitimate, and necessary requirement for the specific occupation. While acknowledging the right of churches to self-determination in employment matters, the CJEU determined the dismissal to be unlawful, as the employer did not generally require staff to be Catholic and had employed non-Catholics in similar roles.
I would like to join others in thanking the High Commissioner for Human Rights for organizing this panel discussion on Human Rights Council Resolution 55/17, Human Rights and a Culture of Peace, adopted two years ago, on 4 April 2024.
This was a remarkable achievement, not least because it was the result of a genuinely cross-regional effort that departed from earlier United Nations Declarations regarding the right to peace. Adopted by consensus at a time of deep political polarization, the Resolution on Human Rights and a Culture of Peace represents an accomplishment that deserves special attention, recognition, and commendation.
In my brief time, I would like to emphasize three observations that I hope will contribute to the shared “experiences, good practices, achievements, challenges and lessons learned concerning strategies for how protecting human rights contributes to promoting and strengthening a culture of peace” (A/HR/RES/55/17 16(a)).
Registering Faith: Recognition, Legal Personality, and Religious Freedom in the Caribbean
by Brandon Reece Taylorian
Caribbean states have inherited—and reshaped—colonial approaches to governing religion. Since gaining independence, governments across the region have had to decide what it means to be “secular,” which communities the state treats as legitimate, and what legal steps religious groups must take to operate in public life. Those choices matter for freedom of religion or belief (FoRB) because recognition and registration rules shape who can manifest their beliefs and how, for example, by building places of worship or providing pastoral care in public institutions like hospitals, prisons, and the military.
Across the Caribbean, several recognition and registration systems are formally optional (communities can exist and worship without registering), while a minority treats registration as mandatory by law or by practice. Yet “optional” does not automatically mean FoRB–friendly: unequal recognition, administrative bureaucracies, and disproportionate information demands often fall hardest on minority, especially non-Christian, communities including Hindus, Muslims, Rastafarians, as well as practitioners of African-rooted folk beliefs like Obeah, Myalism, Santería, Vodou, and Yoruba.
As this essay is being written, it has been more than a month since the February 28 outbreak of hostilities between Israel and the U.S. (on one hand) and Iran (on the other hand). Public criticism of the war has been widespread. Political opponents (and even some normally supportive voices) have complained about the evident lack of planning, unclear objectives, and seeming disregard for the consequences of launching this “war of choice.” The shifting justifications for launching the war (including incoherent gestures toward the urgency of regime change and terminating Iran’s looming nuclear capability) have proven broadly unconvincing. The April 1 White House address of President Trump, broadcast in prime TV time, added little clarity. The ordinary measures of the cost of any war (usually counted in “blood and treasure,” that is, in lives lost and military expenditures) are compounded by an array of regional geopolitical disturbances and economic repercussions stemming from disruptions in the global flow of petroleum.
Search Topics in Law and Religion
Explore topics such as COVID-19, Gender, Jewish Law, LGBTI+, Marriage, Religious Exemption, and Security
Anti-Extremism | Assisted Dying | Autocephaly | Children | Church-State Relations | Constitutional Space | COVID-19 | Death Penalty | Definition of Religion | Digitalization | Discrimination | Equality | Extremism | Family | Family Law | Freedom of Expression | Gender | Genocide | Hagia Sophia | Human Dignity | Human Rights | In Memoriam | Interfaith Dialogue | Islamic Law | Jewish Law | LGBTI+ | Marriage | Minorities | Peacebuilding | Pluralism | Politics | Race | Reasonable Accommodation | Religious Autonomy | Religious Exemption | Religious Freedom | Religious Institutions | Religious Law | Rule of Law | Secularity | Security | Social Service | Ukraine | Russia | War | Digitalization | Humanitarian Aid | Religion and Constitution
Subscribe to our Monthly Newsletter
Fill out the form below to receive updates on topics in law and religion.
